Follow us on Twitter and Facebook

Newsletter Signup

Spam FREE! Join today!

Chapter Support

Enter Amount:

Banner

Calendar Overview

loader

QRID IT!

Advocacy
Gill-net ban back in spotlight - State senator backs proposal, which could end up on ballot PDF Print Write e-mail
Advocacy, Protect
Written by   
Monday, January 02 2012

Gill-net ban back in spotlight

State senator backs proposal, which could end up on ballot

By Lauren Dake / The Bulletin
Published: January 02. 2012 4:00AM PST

SALEM — The use of gill nets to catch Columbia River salmon has long been the subject of controversy. The battle is heating up once again thanks to a new attempt, backed by a state lawmaker, to ban the devices.

Depending on whom you ask, the controversy arises either from environmental concerns or from a disagreement about which group — commercial fishermen or sport fishermen — should be able to harvest the most salmon.

Gill nets, often used by commercial fishermen, catch fish by their gills. In doing so, critics say, they injure fish and minimize the number that can be thrown back into the river alive. Those who’d like to ban gill nets on the Columbia would like to expand the use of seine nets, which have a smaller and, presumably, less punishing mesh.

The Endangered Species Act protects certain types of salmon and steelhead in the Columbia River, thus limiting the number that can be caught.

“There are definitely two sides to the issue,” said Steve Williams, an assistant administrator with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. “From the sport-fishing industry side, they look at it as a situation where if they weren’t having to share the fish with the commercial industry, there would be more fish available for them. From the commercial fish side of it, they look at it as a long-standing historical business that’s been in this state for many years. It’s really an issue of, we have a limited number of fish and a lot of people fishing, and people on both sides have opinions about who should have those fish.”

Read more...  [Gill-net ban back in spotlight - State senator backs proposal, which could end up on ballot]
 
Bend water project based on outdated information PDF Print Write e-mail
Advocacy
Written by   
Wednesday, December 14 2011
By Douglas Werme
Published: December 01. 2011 4:00AM PST

The city of Bend is facing criticism from a wide-ranging group of concerned citizens on the proposed surface water improvement project. As a geologist with 30 years’ experience in the energy business, I thought I would look into the energy costs used in the city’s analysis. I found that assumptions used are now outdated and require a complete reanalysis. The very source of the city’s data, the Northwest Power and Conservation Council, has issued a major revision to its predictions.

The city commissioned a 50-page report comparing the cost of the proposed surface water project to water supplied by wells. Energy costs are central to the analysis. Electricity costs have a double-barrelled impact on the comparison in that wells will require electricity to run the pumps while the surface water alternative could generate electricity that can be sold. The study the city relies upon assumed electricity prices will triple in 17 years.

Eighty percent of the planned new electrical generating capacity in the U.S. will use natural gas. The market price of electricity from any source, whether it is from hydro, wind or a conventional power plant, will be tied to the price of natural gas.

In 2008, oil prices shot up to $100 a barrel, and natural gas peaked at more than $13 per million BTU. At that time, it seemed reasonable to predict climbing costs for all forms of energy. Now, oil is again above $100, but natural gas is not $13 — it is $3.10. The reason for this is that advances in producing gas from fractured shales have yielded a huge flow of natural gas. Recently, oil has also been produced from fractured shales, with large amounts of associated gas as a byproduct, which will be sold at whatever price the market will offer.

The city used electrical price projections predicting a steady climb from $50 per megawatt hour to $150 by 2028. Wholesale power actually declined last summer to $30.04. The Northwest Power and Conservation Council issued a report earlier this month revising its energy cost predictions. It cites a fundamental shift in the entire energy supply, and propose a scenario with flat natural gas prices through 2030 and suppressed electricity prices.

Read more...  [Bend water project based on outdated information]
 
Board Members of the Deschutes Chapter of Trout Unlimited PDF Print Write e-mail
Advocacy, Secretaries Message
Written by   
Thursday, December 08 2011
Gabe Parr - Deschutes Chapter #552 of Trout Unlimited SecretaryLet me introduce myself to those of you who I haven't had the pleasure of meeting.  My name is Gabe Parr and I am the current Secretary for the Deschutes Chapter and also the Communications Chair.  Over the past few years we have grown our board considerably and as a group we felt it would be a great time to re-introduce ourselves to our members and our Central Oregon Community.

We have a very diverse Board currently, with backgrounds from all walks of life and variety of professional endeavors. It is my belief we represent a good cross-section of the Central Oregon Community as we know it today.  Long time residents and Chapter members who have been giving us insight, our new members eagerly stepping into leadership roles - it is both exciting and a privilege to be part of our leadership group.  Our focus as a group has never been keener to address the many issues we face here in the Upper Deschutes Basin.
  • Our Mission:
    The Deschutes Chapter of Trout Unlimited currently has over 400 members dedicated to working with all organizations in the area to improve the Upper Deschutes Watershed.  These goals are rooted in our desire to conserve, protect, restore and advocate for Central Oregon coldwater fisheries and the watersheds that support them.
  • About Trout Unlimited:
    Trout Unlimited is national organization with more than 140,000 volunteers in 400 chapters nationwide. This dedicated grassroots army is matched by a respected professional staff of lawyers, policy experts and scientists in 30 offices throughout the country. Trout Unlimited remains at the forefront of fisheries restoration work at the local, state and national levels.
Please say hello to the current Deschutes Chapter of Trout Unlimited Board of Directors:
Last Updated on Tuesday, March 06 2012 18:56
Read more...  [Board Members of the Deschutes Chapter of Trout Unlimited]
 
A week in Salem for Tom Wolf - Oregon Council of Trout Unlimited Chair PDF Print Write e-mail
Advocacy
Written by   
Wednesday, March 09 2011
Foreword: This is just one of many emails that Tom Wolf sends out to the leaders of Trout Unlimited throughout Oregon.  His tireless efforts are truly amazing for me to be witness to, and I cannot think of a better suited representative of the Trout Unlimited mission here in Oregon. - Gabe Parr, Communications Chair for the Deschutes Chapter of TU.  This article is taken verbatim from his email, and if there are any questions regarding its content, or if anyone is interested in some of the attachments mentioned in this article, please contact me directly at communications@deschutestu.org.

Monday-met with Bob Van Dyke , Wild Salmon Center, to talk strategy about natural conservation areas, HB 2736 and a possible concept for a forest reserve in Tillamook forest-which I will talk more about later.
 
Tuesday - Salem Legislative session reconvenes. Attended OCN weekly meeting and some natural resources committees. No bills that would effect TU priorities were up.
 
Read more...  [A week in Salem for Tom Wolf - Oregon Council of Trout Unlimited Chair]
 
Election night and what that means to OCTU legislative agenda PDF Print Write e-mail
Advocacy
Written by   
Saturday, November 06 2010
First of all it is nice to have a Saturday where I am not knocking on doors or phone banking for pro-conservation candidate or Measure 76. Also the election night party we had for Measure 76 in Portland Hilton was nicest election party I have ever been to.
 
But now that the election is over and the debris has settled , I wanted to let you know what the results will mean for our legislative agenda.
 
First of all, in the office of Governor, the lection of John Kitzhauber is good news for the conservation community-no matter how you voted or what your personal feelings are towards him. I think he will work with us on board and commission appointments and support the bills we have. Also I think he will pick a Natural Resource advisor who will be open to us , more so then the previous Natural Resource advisor, Mike Carrier. In his victory speech on Thursday morning, which I sent to you, he makes a clear reference to making conservation victories a major goal of his administration. Let's face it though,dealing with a $3.2 billion  deficit will take up a lot of his time but I think the environment will be a focus of his and since he is a fisherman, he will be good for us in the wild fish/cold water conservation community. I look forward to working with him and his Natural Resource staff.
Read more...  [Election night and what that means to OCTU legislative agenda]
 
«StartPrev123NextEnd»
page 1 of 3

Powered by Joomla!1.5 Multicategories